Global Mean Annual Time of Wetness (TOW) ERA5

Interactive map with scientific data analysis, point lookup, and detailed environmental information

Map Information

This dataset represents the global mean annual Time of Wetness (TOW) derived from hourly ERA5 reanalysis data for the period 2020–2024.

Data Source:
Environmental Data
Units:
h/year
Coverage:
GLOBAL
Citation:
Mazzella, J. (2026). Mean Annual Time of Wetness (TOW), 2020–2024 (derived from ERA5 hourly reanalysis data). AtmosphericIQ LLC / Engineering Director, Inc.
Data Legend
Values are displayed with colors from lowest (left) to highest (right)
Interactive Environmental Data Map
Click anywhere on the map to get data values for that location
Location Analysis
Technical Specifications

Mean Annual Time of Wetness (TOW) (2020–2024)

Overview

This dataset represents the global mean annual Time of Wetness (TOW) derived from hourly ERA5 reanalysis data for the period 2020–2024.

Time of Wetness is one of the most important environmental variables influencing:

  • Atmospheric corrosion
  • Electrolyte formation
  • Moisture persistence
  • Corrosion cell activity
  • Chloride retention
  • Material durability

The raster represents estimated long-term mean annual wetness conditions at approximately 1 km spatial resolution.

Units:

  • Hours per year (hr/year)

Background

Time of Wetness (TOW) is a core environmental parameter within the ISO 9223 atmospheric corrosivity framework and represents the cumulative duration during which environmental conditions are favorable for corrosion processes.

TOW is directly associated with:

  • Surface moisture persistence
  • Electrolyte formation
  • Atmospheric conductivity
  • Corrosion initiation
  • Corrosion propagation
  • Atmospheric corrosivity classification

ISO 9223 defines Time of Wetness as the cumulative duration during which:

  • Relative Humidity (RH) > 80%
  • Air Temperature (T) > 0°C

Higher TOW values generally indicate increased atmospheric corrosion potential, particularly when combined with elevated chloride deposition, sulfate deposition, and pollutant exposure.

This dataset was developed to provide global TOW estimates suitable for corrosion engineering, environmental modeling, and GIS-based exposure assessment.


Modeling Methodology

The TOW framework utilizes hourly ERA5 climate reanalysis data to evaluate wetness conditions at each grid cell.

Primary inputs include:

  • ERA5 2-meter air temperature (t2m)
  • ERA5 2-meter dew point temperature (d2m)

The modeling framework incorporates:

Relative Humidity Calculation

Relative humidity was calculated using the Magnus equation from hourly temperature and dew point temperature observations.

Wetness Criteria

An hour was classified as "wet" when:

  • Relative Humidity > 80%
  • Air Temperature > 0°C

Annual Aggregation

Hourly wetness occurrences were summed for each year:

  • 2020
  • 2021
  • 2022
  • 2023
  • 2024

Multi-Year Averaging

The final raster represents the mean annual Time of Wetness calculated from the five-year average of annual TOW values.

The resulting framework provides globally consistent wetness estimates suitable for atmospheric corrosion and environmental exposure applications.


Interpretation Guidelines

Time of Wetness (hr/year) Interpretation
0–500 Very Dry
500–1,500 Low Wetness
1,500–3,000 Moderate Wetness
3,000–5,000 High Wetness
>5,000 Persistent Wetness

Higher TOW values generally indicate increased atmospheric corrosion potential due to longer periods of electrolyte persistence on exposed surfaces.


Spatial Resolution

Property Value
Coverage Global
Native Resolution ~0.25° (~27 km)
Published Resolution ~1 km
Coordinate System WGS 84
EPSG Code 4326
Temporal Coverage 2020–2024

Data Sources

Primary environmental inputs include:

Derived environmental layers include:

  • Temperature
  • Relative Humidity
  • Atmospheric Corrosion Layers
  • Environmental Exposure Layers

Intended Applications

This dataset may be used for:

  • Atmospheric corrosion assessment
  • ISO 9223 modeling
  • Corrosion risk screening
  • Materials durability studies
  • Infrastructure asset management
  • Environmental exposure analysis
  • Climate-based engineering assessments
  • GIS visualization
  • Enterprise API workflows

Related Datasets

Corrosion Layers

Supporting Atmospheric Layers

Supporting Coastal & Terrain Layers


Attribution

Joseph Mazzella
AtmosphericIQ LLC
Engineering Director, Inc.


Dataset Citation

Mazzella, J. (2026). Mean Annual Time of Wetness (TOW), 2020–2024 (derived from ERA5 hourly reanalysis data). AtmosphericIQ LLC / Engineering Director, Inc.


Supporting Dataset Citations

ERA5 Reanalysis

Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., et al. (2020). The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146(730), 1999–2049.
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803

Copernicus Climate Data Store

Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S). ERA5 Hourly Data on Single Levels.
https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/

ECMWF

European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). ERA5 Reanalysis Dataset.
https://www.ecmwf.int/

ISO 9223 Standard

ISO 9223:2012. Corrosion of metals and alloys — Corrosivity of atmospheres — Classification, determination and estimation.
https://www.iso.org/standard/53499.html


Version Information

Property Value
Dataset Name Mean Annual Time of Wetness (TOW)
Dataset Version 1.0
Publication Year 2026
Author Joseph Mazzella
Organization AtmosphericIQ LLC / Engineering Director, Inc.
Temporal Coverage 2020–2024
Native Resolution ~0.25° (~27 km)
Published Resolution ~1 km
Units Hours per Year (hr/year)
Coordinate System WGS 84 (EPSG:4326)
Coverage Global
Source Dataset ERA5 Hourly Reanalysis
Wetness Criteria RH > 80% and Temperature > 0°C

Data Distribution Analysis

These histograms show the distribution of pixel values across the entire raster dataset, helping you understand the range and frequency of different measurements.

Linear Scale Distribution
Shows the actual frequency distribution of values using a standard linear scale.
Logarithmic Scale Distribution
Shows the same data using a logarithmic scale, making it easier to see patterns in data with large value ranges.